Skip to Main Content

History 101 - American History Since 1877

A collection of Open Educational Resources for History 101.

Timeline of World History

Primary vs Secondary Sources

 

Primary vs. Secondary Sources

Published on June 20, 2018 by Raimo Streefkerk. Revised on January 23, 2023.

When you do research, you have to gather information and evidence from a variety of sources.

Primary sources provide raw information and first-hand evidence. Examples include interview transcripts, statistical data, and works of art. Primary research gives you direct access to the subject of your research.

Secondary sources provide second-hand information and commentary from other researchers. Examples include journal articles, reviews, and academic books. Thus, secondary research describes, interprets, or synthesizes primary sources.

Primary sources are more credible as evidence, but good research uses both primary and secondary sources.

Primary-Sources-vs-Secondary-Sources

Critical Thinking and Analysis

Defining Critical Thinking

Critical thinking...the awakening of the intellect to the study of itself.

Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action. In its exemplary form, it is based on universal intellectual values that transcend subject matter divisions: clarity, accuracy, precision, consistency, relevance, sound evidence, good reasons, depth, breadth, and fairness.

More information can be found at The Foundation for Critical Thinking

Defining Historical Analysis

 

Historical analysis is an examination of the past which focuses on why certain events unfolded the way they did and what significance it had.  History is more than a narrative of the past; the discipline cares less for the who, what, where, and when of an event, instead focusing on how and why certain events unfolded the way they did and what it all means. History is about argument, interpretation, and consequence. To complete quality historical analysis—that is, to “do history right”–one must use appropriate evidence, assess it properly (which involves comprehending how it is related to the situation in question), and then draw appropriate and meaningful conclusions based on said evidence.

More information can be found at How History is Made